Previous posting
Return
to Flexion/Extension thread Return
to chart of all threadsFlexion/Extension Thread
Response to
Charlotte Wile's April 24th Posting
Submitted by Ann Hutchinson Guest – May 4, 2006
I totally understand your logic, the only thing is that you lose the 'any' element.
Your Ex. 2a-2f give all three possibilities at the same time, rather like 'three-dimensional'
flexion or extension.
Would you put the 'any' sign under these indications to give them that missing
information?
Previous posting
Return
to Flexion/Extension thread
Return
to chart of all threads